For all the news on the Detroit Conference see this post.
AVFM, in an article titled ‘Excuse Me, What’s So Wrong With Being Anti-Feminist?‘ written by Jack Goodfellow, MRA’s found a way to tear apart Professor Dillaway who appeared as Dean Esmay’s counterpoint on Fox Detroit. Click here for the Fox clip.
Professor Delaway didn’t say much of anything the MRA’s could twist and turn so they suggested that every MRA ‘run the clip without sound’ to analyze her’ body language.’
This is what you see. In that professor’s sideways glances, in the slump, in that cocky smile, in the way she almost always faces the other female in the conversation (the only other person there she feels it is necessary to speak with), the way she places her palms up, hands at chest level (body language to show this has become a personal plea), she shows that the argument is not about men’s rights.
The female Fox co-host was labeled a feminist by AVFM in order to scrutinize her and have it appear that they don’t hate women, just feminists.
The OP continues to tell us what the feminist Professor was thinking based on her body movements.
Her only argument, visible in body language throughout, explicitly in words towards the end, is that the man sitting next to her and all of the people that he was there to represent, have no right to engage in a political discussion that is contrary to the political position that she and other feminists have taken.
Freeze Peeeeech Yo!
Here are some of the AVFM comments analyzing her body language and what it must mean:
You can only come to one conclusion in light of this: You simply REFUSE to discuss any related issues with them, and you DEMAND the respect and rights you deserve as a human being, just like you would do it with children.
She smiled and smirked through the entire beginning of the video, and most often looked to the female interviewer with that knowing look that says “isn’t this funny?” When she is actually addressing any questions, especially from the male interviewer, she spends much of her time avoiding eye contact, then smiling to get agreement.
So we’re basically dealing with children here, incapable of handling dissent from ANYONE, be it within the herd or outside, because the learned rules of behavior from early childhood, when it comes to keeping the protection from the herd intact, still kicks into overdrive when they start feeling vulnerable.
He looks steadfast, defiant, determined.
She looks lost, bewildered, afraid.
The women participating in this interview are psychopaths. Lacking in analytical skills, logic, sense, reason or empathy. Parasitic, opportunistic, manipulative and deceitful. Dishonest, glib, solipsistic, disrespectful and petulant. Irresponsible, self-serving and hypocritical. Remorseless, shameless and guiltless.
AVFM took to their forums and one MRA called her a ‘Stunned cunt.’ So much for Paul Elam’s insistence that AVFM doesn’t call women cunts or bitches or whores, as a class.
When a woman doesn’t agree with male supremacy she must be a child who is part of a feminist herd or a psychopath.
One MRA went through the video and took a snapshot to prove his point about the nasty feminist Professor.
I’m guessing that someone on AVFM will eventually post her personal information and tell others to email her superiors at the Michigan University she teaches at. This is their modus operandi. Wait, it’s already started. One of the MRA’s is talking about contacting Wayne University where she works.
I will be happy to provide Wayne State with a list of candidates who are eminently qualified for an endowed chair in Anti-Feminism.
Oh and I was mentioned by a super angry MRA who’s letting the other herd members know about his severe butt-hurt.