ATTACK: MRA’s Target Female Pediatrician ‘CUT YOUR PUSSY LIPS BITCH!’

Most MRA’s are enamoured with the intactivist movement regarding circumcision. They make silly comparisons between FGM and circ, making people laugh at how ridiculous they are.

Some of these MRA intactivists sit outside medical conventions harassing any woman they can find and talking about their porn fantasies, which include the complete torture of women’s bodies and especially their genitals, while whining about how their dicks don’t work.

Whether you think circ is a good thing or a bad thing, MRA’s use it because it’s something to use as a weapon to attack women. This is precisely what happened when a bunch of them attacked Dr. Monaghan outside a convention. They held up their signs with their crotches spray painted red and told her about what they like to see happen to women’s genitals, especially when they’re at home every day beating off to it.

What they think of the doctor, after they spent days harassing her and beating off to torture of women (comments from AVFM):

AVFM dr monagham

AVFM on female pediatrician Monaghan

Then they got sad face when the good doctor told them that hey, maybe they should cut the whole thing off so they’ll stop harassing her. OMGERDDDD! The doctor talked back! She put my male violence in my face to show me how fucking ridiculous I’m being! Then they told her to ‘cut off your pussy lips BITCH!’ ‘Cut your VULVA BITCH!’ ‘YOU’RE A PEDOPHILE!’

Now it’s true that men love watching a grown male fuck a female child in porn. Teen porn is very popular to these men. I wonder if they know how painful it is for a female child to be penetrated by a grown man.  We’ve also seen a rise in men, fathers and brothers, raping their young daughters and sisters, even infant girls while whacking off to child porn. So really it’s men who are the pedos and are projecting it onto her. Ah yes, the smell of fresh MRA hypocrisy in the morning.

These MRA’s harassed these doctors for days, specifically women, and then when the good doctor got angry they took that one comment and began failling on their fainting couches. They forgot to edit out the sexual violence they wanted to do to her afterward and in a brief moment of intellect, understood what FGM is all about. FGM is about cutting girls completely whereby they have ZERO sexual pleasure and have complications their ENTIRE lives. It makes it easier for men to own women as baby making machines and fuck holes. This never happens to men, ever.

She’s not the first female they’ve harassed. This MRA made another video where he claims he met two women, who he assumed were doctors, and claimed they said they’d stop circumcision when they got equal pay. Of course he didn’t catch any of this on camera. I imagine he targeted a couple women and then started harassing them because that’s what this is really about. These MRA intactivists specifically target women so they can use circ to harass them. It’s as simple as that.

See, it’s ok for dudes to beat off to women and girl children being gagged, anally raped, vaginally torn and bruised on a daily basis but goddammit if a doctor makes a quip about MAH DICK when I’ve been harassing her for days!

Guys, you’re being dumb. Harassing women near medical conventions with your silly diatribes about man hating lesbians who circ boys is you being ridiculous. Your need to get off on the actual torture of women’s and girls genitals in porn marks you as the ultimate hypocrites. I won’t give you any tips on activism because I love watching you make jackasses out of yourselves.

Your dicks work just fine when you beat off to women and children being genitally, anally, and orally tortured on a daily basis. So I don’t want to hear your shit about how you can’t sexually function and manhating lesbian doctors are ruining your life.

You compare FGM to circ and people laugh at you and they’re right to do so. How is it that you don’t understand the differences between how and why girls are cut up to nothing and how and why you are NOT? Nevermind, don’t answer that. You should already know.

Advertisements

24 thoughts on “ATTACK: MRA’s Target Female Pediatrician ‘CUT YOUR PUSSY LIPS BITCH!’

  1. A very large (and very vocal) percentage of western males support & defend circumcision to the death. I know because I’ve debated them, back when I used to give a shit. One was even crazy enough to suggest that it’s no different from infants who get their ears pierced. And of course, I was called a “bitch” and told to “shut up”. So, despite the fact that I do not approve of any child’s genitals being needlessly cut on, I washed my hands of being a SJW for all, and am now focused exclusively on women’s issues.

    These MRAs are too stupid and cowardly to attack the men who are behind all of this; It’s much easier to kick down at women, who are not allowed to do anything without a sizable amount of male approval.

    PS Another school shooting has just went down, in Alabama. Perpetrator description: white male. Hmmm,.. why am I not surprised?

    • Yes, they seem to forget that males/religion/weird Egyptian-priest guys came up with it. Everything they bitch about is a function of patriarchy but it’s all our fault. Why aren’t they yelling at the male doctors/mohels who do it? Oh yeah, it has nothing to do with circumcision, it’s just a chance to harass a woman/women.

      • I’d argue that it’s not *just* a chance to harass women, although that’s a big part of it.

        The fundamental basis of this is that it’s men, and only men, who have the right to dictate what happens to their children. There was a court case in the news several months ago where a father wanted his son circumcised and the mother didn’t want it, and I’m pretty sure the father prevailed. Not a peep from the circ loons or MRAs. That case was decided exactly as it should have been: All decisions revert to the family patriarch.

    • I came to comment on just that. It’s men enforcing this. It’s men who have the power to stop it. I’d wager that most women are neutral on this subject since we don’t have the equipment and so most defer to men’s opinion on whether to cut or not.

      • Right. Men are not only the enemy of women, but they are their own worst enemies as well. I don’t think most of them will ever realize this.

    • Um … how is piercing an infant’s ears not horrible? I mean, the ears are not as sensitive a body part as the genitals, but why inflict any amount of pain and danger on a helpless child who cannot yet make an informed decision?

      A pretty stupid comparison if one wants to defend circumcision, really. Comparing it to a totally useless method of harming children … at least circumcision lowers the risk of HPV infection. While piercing ears does … nothing.

      • Well, yes. Piercing infant’s ears is stupid, but that was the argument he was using. I disagree that removing foreskin has any medical benefit; I believe that is propaganda. Nature knows best, and she put it there for whatever reason.

  2. The comparison is too ludicrous to even consider. Women have their clits cut off or vaginas sewn up as tweeners in certain countries. The foreskin removed on male babies (a procedure they don’t even remember) in the west isn’t comparable…and doctors don’t remove foreskin on boys to enslave them sexually and keep them in their place.
    Another false equivalency.

    • I agree that it’s not the same, but there is no excuse for any child’s genitals to be messed with like that. It’s fucking barbaric and, quite frankly, perverted. It’s just more creepy shit thought up by psychotic male butchers…and now they want to blame a handful of women for partaking in a tradition that their sex created. This world is just so fucked up. I’m sick of it all.

      • I have to say that I’ve been with both circed men and uncirced men and the uncirced men got yeast infections. I remember when my partner from Greece who was uncirced got a yeast infection. I had to take him to the doctors and he had to take internal medicine. The doctor flat out told him it was b/c he wasn’t circed and that he would keep getting them.

        I am Jewish and it’s part of our covenant for boys to be circed and after my experiences with men who are uncirced having problems I would be more likely to circ my child.

        I actually think the medical evidence is pretty compelling FOR it. I also don’t think harassing women at medical conventions accusing them of being man hating lesbians is going to stop the practice.

        Either way, it’s about educating parents about it, not screaming at women.

          • That’s highly debatable, but as I said before, I’m pretty much done defending the autonomy of a group of people who want to deprive women of ours so…yeah.

        • I have to say that I’ve been with both circed men and uncirced men and the uncirced men got yeast infections. I remember when my partner from Greece who was uncirced got a yeast infection. I had to take him to the doctors and he had to take internal medicine. The doctor flat out told him it was b/c he wasn’t circed and that he would keep getting them.

          Perhaps this is just a matter of inadequate hygiene? I’ve been with an uncircumcised man as well, and I have to say that he was actually the cleanest out of all 5 of the dudes I’ve been with, who were circumcised. Either way, yes, men can get yeast infections too, but circumcision doesn’t prevent it. I recall my mother telling me that one of her boyfriends had one, and he was circ’ed. They kept passing it back and forth between each other before they figured out what was going on. LOL Anyhow, I tend to be a bit suspicious of mainstream medical advice, and find it strange that a doctor would blame an entire body part for an infection. That sounds like quackery. I’d be more inclined to blame improper cleansing practices or dietary factors. However, some men’s foreskins are tighter than others, and that can certainly impede the cleaning process. In that case, yes, surgical intervention might be the solution. But, this should be an adult’s choice. An infant cannot consent to such things, and some of them die in the process. I feel the same way about this as I do with female circumcision. IMHO, it doesn’t matter what the reasoning is behind it because it’s still an invasive act being performed on perfectly normal genitalia. I say, let them grow up and then decide whether they want it done or not.

          I also don’t think harassing women at medical conventions accusing them of being man hating lesbians is going to stop the practice.

          Well, obviously. And I can’t stand the lunatics who are engaging in those behaviors. I doubt they actually care one way or another. It’s mostly about furthering their misogynistic agenda. The men in power don’t seem to be bothered by circumcision, so it will continue to be practiced until that changes. Women have nothing to do with it. We don’t get to call the shots.

          • I’d argue that a good start is to make circumcision less expected when parents don’t have a religious reason for it. The widespread use of circumcision in the U.S. doesn’t really make sense except for our obsession with cleanliness. Not that being clean is bad, but Americans often take it too far.

            I think San Francisco banned it outright, but that seems a poor approach given that it’s a religious practice for many. Perhaps start out by forbidding hospitals and doctors from advocating for it, except in the case of a medical necessity. If the parents want it, they have to seek it out and can’t get it added on as part of the package when the infant is still in the hospital. Insurance also shouldn’t be paying for it unless it’s deemed medically necessary. The practice is usually cosmetic.

          • I agree with most of that, but I think religion is a very bad reason to do anything. Remember, the majority of the world’s most atrocious actions have been committed in the name of some imaginary deity. Female genital mutilation is rationalized by this same method, in Islamic countries. I don’t think people should be able to use their religious beliefs as an excuse to infringe on another being’s autonomy. If “God told me to” is accepted as a valid reason to commit certain acts, what other atrocities will be protected under the tent of “religious freedom”? IMHO, that can only lead down a very dark path.

            Most mainstream religions are an entirely male creation, and this is why I choose to dismiss religion-based rationale as a valid point of argument.I debate within the realm of reality. I like to refer to myself as an Atheist Pagan, because I do not worship fictitious deities, but I acknowledge & celebrate the force of Nature, and have great reverence for it. I wish more people could be the same.

        • I’ve had a circumcision for medical reasons. It was by far the most painful experience of my life. Please don’t subject a child to that level of pain.

          I mean, I’m not gonna compare it to FGM, but it’s still way beyond what a baby should ever have to go through.

  3. Oh, and I would just like to say that those phony bloodstains on those dude’s crotches remind me of my first period. Lolz. Wouldn’t it be hilarious to go to one of these idiotic protests and start handing out tampons…*cough*…I means manpons?

Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s