Angry Harry, a British MRA, dropped dead. For a sampling of his ‘work’ he wrote this piece about rape, which of course he blamed on how women dress.
‘Many women, however, seem to wish to take no responsibility for their behaviour. They seem to think that they should be able to flaunt their sexuality all over the place – in order to incite men – and then they think that they have the right to claim that they are victims when some men respond to them in a manner which is absolutely consistent with the message that they, themselves, have been sending out.’~Angry Harry
Paul Elam moaned that he was looking forward to meeting this shit-heel in Britain during the upcoming ManBawl 2016. Elam also called him the ‘greatest MRA’ ever.
Good riddance, rape apologist, misogynist scumbag.
Mancheeze 
umm. wow. okay then. yay i guess. im not sure how to feel about this
Shame on you , you sick people are happy for people dying because they have different ideology than you , because he is a man he has no opinion. If you believe in equality why are you demanding supremacy ? Isn’t that being hypocrite ?
LOL
I’m having a very hard time understanding why you wont remove the comment I asked about. You are endangering me. Please, I don’t know how many more times i can ask you? I don’t have any way to do it. I have sent a note to another feminist blogger who i have spoken to before to ask if she might know you and to perhaps ask on my behalf. I am very serious about this and I have a very real reason. please? You have no contact info so once again I am having to put up yet ANOTHER comment. please? I am beside myself wondering why you would do this to me by ignoring my pleas.
Read this carefully and for the last time:
I REMOVED IT WHEN YOU ASKED ME TO.
Yes, precisely.
Don’t you just LOVE the fact that feminists continually claim to be for “Equality” of both sexes, yet do EVERYTHING in their power to oppose men’s issues being spoken on, and do everything they can to oppose MEN’S rights?
And don’t you just LOVE how feminists claim to “Not Hate Men” and yet all they do is talk about…, well…, how much they HATE MEN.
If Angry Harry had been female, it’s highly unlikely Mancheese and other feminists would publicly wet themselves with glee over her death.
But, hey.., He was a man with a differing opinion from their own, so… “YIPPEE!!”.
Yeah, Feminists wonder why so MANY are conflating them with the likes of the Nazis and other hate-mobs.
Ya think, this and other reasons, might be WHY?
I am a FORMER feminist.
But I am for treating EVERYONE fairly and rightly, regardless of race, color creed sexual orientation, religion and GENDER!
…That is why I am an EX-feminist.
Feminists CLEARLY, and DEMONSTRABLY do NOT believe the same.
Yeah, feminists… Good luck with your deteriorating P.R.
You’re gonna need it.
But then.., as always…, it isn’t MEN you have to blame. It is YOURSELVES!
Good day.
LOL. Whine moar dude.
I don’t know where you get your information about feminists, troll, but I have every reason to hate men. It is right and just for us to hate our tormentors and to rejoice in the small measure of justice that comes in the form of their deaths. If you are for everyone “fairly” and whatever other B.S. you wrote, then you are not for women’s liberation. There is no fairness to women in men. They believe we are livestock, at best. They take pleasure in raping, subjugating, and killing us. They have entire systems set up to facilitate their depravity. Men – random men – have nearly ended my life and tortured me for their pleasure. It would be wrong for me to feel anything but hatred for them and it is certainly wrong and highly abusive of other people to expect me to feel any other way.
Death is a friend to those who seek peace and justice.
I am entirely for the silencing of men (who never shut up!), primarily by denying them entry to the physical plane.
P.R. is hardly the point of feminism. You definitely have the wrong idea about feminism, all around.
Where do I get my information on feminists?
From you feminist loons, YOURSELVES!
There’s loads of documentation (video proof, and otherwise) of what you stand for.
And let me tell ya, Love, it ain’t for equality.
Citations needed?
Here ya go, Love All documented, and verifiable:
The N.O.W. have also tried to blockade attempts for shared parenthood for both sexes:
http://www.nownys.com/leg_memos_2009/oppose_a3181.html (https://archive.is/VeyhR)
http://www.michnow.org/files/jointmandatorycustody.pdf (https://web.archive.org/web/20150103150337/http://www.michnow.org/files/jointmandatorycustody.pdf)
Feminists have also pushed forward laws which unfairly advantage women. For example the Tender Years Doctrine made it so women were the assumed caregivers (gender roles!):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tender_years_doctrine
Feminist definition of domestic violence has skewed arrests and prosecutions resulting in female batterers being let off:
http://www.law.fsu.edu/journals/lawreview/downloads/304/kelly.pdf (http://www.amen.ie/theses/Dis%20Linda%20Kelly.pdf)
http://vaw.sagepub.com/content/8/11/1332.abstract
http://www.saveservices.org/2012/02/cdc-study-more-men-than-women-victims-of-partner-abuse/
Huge bibliography on domestic violence containing +200 empirical studies and +60 reviews/analyses which demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive or moreso in their relationships:
http://web.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm (aggregate sample size exceeds 371,600)
FEMINISTS suppressing evidence showing half of domestic violence is done by women:
http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/V74-gender-symmetry-with-gramham-Kevan-Method%208-.pdf (http://tinyurl.com/me4zoo)
Another investigation by Straus concerning 30 years of hiding DV statistics by FEMINISTS:
Click to access V71-Straus_Thirty-Years-Denying-Evidence-PV_10.pdf
Feminist shelter refusing to equally cater to men who are victims of domestic violence:
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/oct/07/feminist-protesters-storm-red-carpet-at-london-premiere-of-suffragette
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/culturepicturegalleries/11918714/Suffragette-film-premiere-Femenists-stage-protest-on-red-carpet-in-pictures.html
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/aug/03/domestic-violence-refuge-crisis-women-closure-safe-houses
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/5109310/Womens-refuges-told-to-help-male-domestic-violence-victims-or-lose-their-funding.html
Feminists petition government to give money to women, whilst men suffered most during recession:
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/659dkrod.asp#
Radical Feminists disrupt CAFE Ottawa inaugural meeting:
Feminists disrupt meeting on male suicide:
Protester Pulls Fire Alarm At UofT MRA Meeting:
Feminists Disrupt a Forum About Battered Husbands:
Janice Fiamengo speech Ottawa U disruption:
MR-E at Queens Park Rally:
Hypocrisy with female perpetrators:
http://jezebel.com/the-right-to-a-sexual-narrative-on-the-lena-dunham-abu-1654187731
http://jezebel.com/josh-duggar-admits-to-molestation-accusations-1706162371
FBI definition: Koss, Mary. “Detecting the scope of rape. A review of Prevalence Research methods.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Vol 8 No. 2, June (1993)198-222. Print.
https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/publications/abstract.aspx?ID=143405
–Context; “A further issue is the sex neutrality of reform statutes, which has been ignored in all but a handful of studies (Except George & Winfield-Laird, 1986; Sorenson et al., 1987). Instead, focus has been restricted to female victims. This restriction makes practical sense because over 90% of the rapes identified in the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) involve female victims (Jaimeson & Flanagan, 1989). Although consider-ation of male victims is within the scope of the legal statutes, it is important to restrict the term rape to instances where male victims were penetrated by offenders. It is inappropriate to consider as a rape victim a man who engages in unwanted sexual intercourse with a woman (e.g., Struckman-Johnson, 1991). A final problem is the practice of summing attempts and completed rapes. Although it follows common-law practice to include attempted rapes in the figure presented as “rape prevalence,” seperate reporting of attempted and completed rapes is more precise and less prone to confusion when comparing across studies (Block & Block, 1984).” Page 206-207.
Changing of rape laws to favour female predators:
http://www.jpost.com/Israel/Womens-groups-Cancel-law-charging-women-with-rape
http://www.firstpost.com/india/rape-law-amendment-where-are-the-cases-of-sexual-violence-against-men-384227.html
Suppressing certain portions of domestic violence:
Feminists fighting against equal custody:
http://web.archive.org/web/20070708213232/http:/michnow.org/jointcustody507.htm
http:/michnow.org/jointcustody507.htm
(They took it down, but it’s been archived.)
Student Union blockades men’s issues group, despite two of three of the members being women:
http://www.macleans.ca/education/uniandcollege/ryerson-students-union-censors-mens-issues-group/
Yes, Abuser, that is the work of feminists and all right-thinking women – to try to keep children, including our own children, out of the hands of male abusers like yourself.
We, also, work to keep ourselves out of the hands of abusers like yourself.
It was very nice of you to post such a comprehensive list of so many feminists’ excellent work in the service of humanity.
You are, indeed, one honest Feminist.
Okay, MRA. An rape apologist is not a good person. His dying is not a loss to humanity. And what little boys like you call “men’s rights” are men fighting to dominate and hurt women. Us not wanting to be hurt and dominated, and naming men as the people who do that to us, is not hate. It’s common sense.
-_-
No….
What Men’s Rights Activists are “fighting” for is the following:
Men are 97% of combat fatalities.
Men pay 97% of Alimony
Men make 94% of work suicides.
Men make up 93% of work fatalities.
Men make up 81% of all war deaths.
Men lose custody in 84% of divorces.
80% of all suicides are men.
77% of homicide victims are men.
89% of men will be the victim of at least one violent crime.
Men are over twice as victimised by strangers as women.
Men are 165% more likely to be convicted than women.
Men get 63% longer sentences than women for the same crime.
Court bias against men is at least 6 times bigger than racial bias.
Males are discriminated against in school and University.
Boys face vastly more corporal punishment than girls.
60-80% of the homeless are men.
Women’s Cancers receive 15 times more funding than men’s
At least 10% of fathers are victims of paternity fraud.
One third of all fathers in the USA have lost custody of children, most are expected to pay for this.
40-70% of domestic violence is against men however less than 1% of domestic violence shelter spaces are for men.
Male fatality rates are vastly higher than women’s
Worldwide there are 107 men born for every 100 women, by age 65 there are 78 men for every 100 women, in countries like the USA & UK, its even worse, with 75/76 men for every 100 women. Despite the fact that health care spending for men is nearly twice as effective. In the few countries that have a majority male population and a preference for male children like China, Sons are legally obliged to care for parents when they are older, where as daughters are not. Many other countries like India have this as a social obligation. goo.gl/iZUcJJ
Despite all the pressures and risks facing men today support services for men are almost non existent compared to services for women. There are departments for women’s issues in the White House and the UN, but none for men. The UN promotes genital mutilation of male children but condems female genital mutilation. This is Real Sexism.
THE REAL MONEY GAP.
Men earn 61.5% of all income but only account for 25% of domestic spending. Men only spend 40% of what they earn after tax. In contrast women make up 38.5% of all income but control 75% of domestic spending, women on average spend 90% MORE MONEY THAN THEY EARN. Men are exploited as cash machines and even with spending on children accounted for women still spend more money on themselves than the combined spending for men and children. This can even be observed in the floor space allocated to women’s products in most shopping centres.
TAX & HEALTHCARE DISCRIMINATION
Men pay over 70% of income tax but the vast majority of public spending is on services for women. There is more money spent on breast cancer than lung cancer and prostate cancer combined, despite the fact that lung cancer alone has 3-4 times more fatalities than breast cancer. A man’s chance of getting cancer is 44% and 23% of men will die from cancer, 38% of women get cancer and 19% die. Yet there is vastly more money spent on cancer for women, this is lethal discrimination. Women pay 60% less tax despite spending 300% more in domestic spending than men. Women also consume two third of public spending, there are 3 times the amount of gender specific health services for women than men despite the fact that for equal increases in health spending a man’s life expectancy rate increases nearly twice as much as a woman’s.
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
There are hundreds of surveys which shows women are as violent if not more violent than men in domestic violence cases. Men get arrested in 85% of all arrests but its estimated that Women are the perpetrators in most Domestic Violence cases. Most reciprocal violence is started by women and 70% of non reciprocal violence is perpetrated by women. Women however only get arrested in 15% of all DV arrests. This example of 572 different studies covering 371,600 people demonstrate that women are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their relationships with their spouses or male partners. http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm
More men than women were victims of intimate partner physical violence and over 70% of severe physical violence was directed at men. http://www.batteredmen.com/NISVS.htm
Despite this though,99.3% of DV shelter spaces are for women and even men who report violence against them by women are arrested far more often than the woman who is attacking them.
If you got your information from elsewhere, besides the usual hate-confirmation-biased sources, you might know all this.
Sorry…, buy Mancheese, Clementine Ford, Tumblr, Twitter, etc. are NOT legitimate sources of non-biased information.
It’s nice to see that we have the enemy on the run. We are winning! Thanks for the update, fella.
My lordy word, all the same old false and unsubstantiated statistics trotted out ad nauseum. Cos you’re so on top of everything you know that eg deaths of prostitutes have only recently started being added to the ‘workplace death stats’ right? And it used to be that eg nurses murdered on their way to pick up their cars in the carpark were random victims while miners driving to and from work were always counted in the stats.
And where the fuck did you get the 81% of people who die in war are men? Obviously not looking at the civilian deaths I guess (cos civilians only count if they live in the US, or the UK or another western country etc otherwise they aren’t counted). I know you MRA types always like to talk about how western feminists ignore the plight of women in say Afghanistan etc – how come they aren’t included in your death stats above? Not white enough for you?
And how about the domestic violence rates small dick. Put that in your war death rates. In most Western Countries, more women die each year as a result of domestic violence than soldiers die for their country (there are some spikes but if you look at the overall stats excepting eg ww1, ww2 etc) then more women are killed by their partners or exes than soldiers in most years. I can’t speak for the non western world but if we are admitting to it at these rates, I’m not optimistic given how hard it was to get these stats recognised in the fist place at our end.
Now that’s what I call a war and it’s against women and you, sir, are a gormless tool.
Thanks for playing
I love you.
What these MRA’s do is go to their online database of trufax and copy/paste them onto feminist blogs. Everything pasted by this douche has already been debunked a thousand times over and I honestly don’t have time to do it all again. I will tell you that ‘erica’ will not be posting here again and neither will superslav. They’ve used up my troll tolerance. I ip banned them both.
It’s a shame we see women doing this to other women. Let them go back to MRA-land where they’ll get money and dick pics galore. Some women just can’t find their own strength and rely on men to validate them.
You guys just copy and paste the same false statistics and arguments over and over again. Half the stuff you’re talking about, if not all of it, is the fault of the capitalist patriarchy we live in, not women. Blame your fellow men for your problems, especially the rich ones.
It’s libfems, third wavers, you know the feminists that MRAs still shit on despite being pro-porn, pro-prostitution, pro-kink, men/MTF-first male worshippers, who proclaim that they don’t hate men. I’m certain House Mouse Queen does not consider herself a libfem. Do try to keep up.
What? And no feminists support “Kink-Porn”?
…Evidently you have never seen Lesbian pornography.
…Just saying.
You’re a dude and you’ve been ip banned.
You’re a dude and you’ve been ip banned.
Shame on us?! Shame on you and your sick male supremacy that has been keeping women from their real potential, and from just being considered full human beings since the beginning of time! You have some nerve coming here and calling us sick when it’s your *men’s rights* group who are the ones demanding the *right* to terrorize and violate women without repercussions. This guy, like all MRAs, was angry that women have gained the human rights they should have had in the first place, and so he vocally and very likely violently expressed his delusional male entitlement over women while he was alive. As women, we have every right to be happy there is one less misogynist in the world and wish they would all drop dead, and for misogyny to die with them.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
How old are you, little man? Let me guess — over 12 but under 16. Maybe about 14 or 15? Where in the world did you get the idea that we’re demanding supremacy? It’s amazing that so many men think that women asking men to leave us the fuck alone is us wanting supremacy. WE WANT YOU TO STOP DOMINATING US. You not dominating us does not mean we are dominating you. It’s not a fucking zero-sum game.
The odd thing, is Cassandra… That is exactly the same thing I hear men say about US!
Just how delusional are you, “Erika”? Obviously at the very least as delusional as men, which means you aren’t capable of living in the real world due to your MRA tinted glasses. I very much doubt you are a woman, so go back to your MRA forums and continue your woman-hating orgy there, because no sensible person wants to read your bullshit.
Just how far do you have your tongue up the patriarchal asshole? Have reached the colon yet?
The good news just keeps coming! Thanks, HMQ! Thanks for your recent excellent vids, too!
Good riddance! Now if only Paul Elam, Roosh, and the rest of these subhuman freaks of nature would follow their fellow cock worshiper to hell. Can you imagine if all misogynists dropped dead simultaneously? Not only would the world be instantly a much better and more peaceful place, but it would reduce the male population to much more manageable levels too. Major win for women, children, animals, and the planet in general.
Oh, yes….
Feminism certainly ISN’T about hating men, is it?
Oooh! What do we have here, below?!?
http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/default/files/styles/image_content_width/hash/d0/c4/d0c47dbef284f99b60d4b8dbe41e6547.JPG?itok=RFJmNy1A
(well, so much for feminism being in favour of BOTH sexes….)
(oh, yes…, HERE’s “logic” for you…)
(No hate here. (in a pig’s eye…) )
(From a large number of feminist Youtubers)
Well, anyways… I easily found LOADS of this “Kill men”, “I hate men”, feminist bollocks. And to be fair.., I also looked for any feminist blogs, discussion forums and the like where feminists WERE’NT going on and on about hating and killing men.
But you know what…? I couldn’t even find ONE!
So, well…
I guess feminists are a bunch of lying HYPOCRITES.
Who’d-a-thunk it?
What’s your problem, dude? You’ve already been told that feminist, and probably lots of women, in general, who simply understand the principle of self-preservation, hate you.
Thanks, again, for all the great graphics. You’ve done a lot of work for me and now I know right were to go, if I need graphics for my next post on how to stop johns, pimps, and sex traffickers.
“this piece about rape, which of course he blamed on how women dress.”
“‘Many women, however, seem to wish to take no responsibility for their behaviour. They seem to think that they should be able to flaunt their sexuality all over the place – in order to incite men – and then they think that they have the right to claim that they are victims when some men respond to them in a manner which is absolutely consistent with the message that they, themselves, have been sending out.’~Angry Harry”
Interesting…. Not once did he say he blamed women, for how we how dress for us being raped.
Mancheese. Why don’t you read the words people type, instead of the words you put IN their MOUTHS?
You are such a bleeding Chuckle-Monkey. -_-
Women like you who lick the assholes of these faggots are a disgrace.
Seriously. Lmao do you think these mras scumbags give a shit about you as a woman? Do you, for a chance, think of them of knights in a shining armor who would help you, who are fair and listen to everyone, that they won’t screw over women’s issues in order to make themselves (men) look as the poor poor abused victims (when it’s pretty clear that they are not) when they are larger than us, more dangerous than us, and have way waaaay more power than us ?? Jesus christ, take a look around you, take a history book. This shit is everywhere. In the internet, in history, in the everyday life. It’s been always like this and it still is nowadays.
Now, do you really believe this horseshit, don’t you? That he was not blamming women but only the stuff they unfortunately chose to wear to tempt the poor poor menz to assault them. Holy shit you’ve got some fucking issues to read between the goddamn lines.
Have fun in the male utopia, handmaiden.
oh..! Well, I rather think I would prefer a “male-utopia” to the feminist Hate-Utopia.
At least MRAs don’t go around talking about slaughtering women, the way feminists love to go on and on about slaughtering men.
Or are you not familiar with hashtags such as #KillAllMen, #KillAllWhiteMen and other such feminist hate-favorites.
No thank you. I don’t want to live in a hate-world. And that is all feminists want.
You all just love to preach “Equality” out of one side of your mouth, while claiming “Superiority” out of the other.
I am an EX-feminist, Deary.
I’ve been to the conventions, the meetings, the protests and all the other things.
But I’m afraid that feminism and I have a conflict of interest. You see… I believe in equality for all people, regardless of race, color, sexual orientation, religion and GENDER.
Feminists do NOT.
That, Love, is why I am an EX-feminist.
Also… Maybe YOU should read a history book OUTSIDE of a woman’s studies class. You might LEARN something, for a change.
Lastly.., I would just LOVE for you to tell me just ONE legal, legitimate right that men have that we do not? And I mean LEGITIMATE rights. Not the feminist redefinition of legal rights!
…I’ll be waiting, Love!
…and waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting….
@Erika WTF?! That’s EXACTY what MRAs do! They talk about raping and killing women all the time! BTW, jigs up, dude. You’re obviously a male because there’s no way in hell any woman could be that blind to men’s constant rape threats towards women, not to mention the actual rape and murders of women committed everyday by the male plague.
this is.. honestly kind of sickening. okay let me first point out that even if he died, so what? he died a misogynist. in the eyes of other misogynists, he died a martyr. as Orwell’s 1984 points out, you need to first convert the heretic before killing him, or he still dies a heretic and nothing changes. when you call this a victory, you make it sound like you personally killed him, and i don’t know if that is better or worse. it isn’t really a victory. he died. the end. there are probably millions more like him and the fact that one of them died to natural cause isn’t really anything special. many more will die tomorrow, and many more will be born. ideology of person isn’t really anything that can be controlled.
honestly if you really want to strike a victory go to a third world country. this blog post is as pointless as this guy’s death in the grand scheme of things
Angry Harry caused a lot problems for women online. He is no longer able to do this. Only Death could have stopped him – the police sure don’t give a damn about online harassment. So, yay Death!
No… Angry Harry caused a lot of problems for FEMINISTS online.
get your pronouns straight, Love.
Any woman that doesn’t hate men, try to suppress male voices, when it comes to men’s rights and issues (that are just as legitimate as our own) had NO PROBLEM from or with Angry Harry.
But don’t worry.
There are zillions of us, out here (Male and Female, alike) who have already picked up Harry’s mantle.
“the police sure don’t give a damn about online harassment. So, yay Death!”
Mmm… You mean like the online harassment I get from other women (well, feminist women)? You mean the 3 doxings I got from other women (well, feminist women)? You mean the death threats I get from other women (well, feminist women)? You mean the “Lesbian Rape” threats I have gotten from other women (well, feminist women)?
Yes… you’re right. The police sure don’t give a damn about online harassment… when feminists do it. (even when it’s to other women).
It’s not pointless – it really put a smile on my face!
that smile will disappear as soon as another misogynist comes into the limelight.
and again, even though he cant cause problems anymore, many other misogynists will continue to do so. the goal should be to convert the misogynists, not kill them. that would put an even bigger smile on your face
Yeah, convert a misogynist! LOL! That’s hilarious.
Does this conversion process involve a .22 magnum, by any chance?
Only third wave feminists see an online writer with a different opinion dying as some sort of victory. In your own terms: so fragile.
Apparently you don’t know too much. We’re not third wavers. Get an education.
No, I have studied feminism and I am well aware of what you label yourselves as. But you are still an offshoot of the inactivist, social-analytical, drama-queen bunch that will do anything to be considered a victim and “win” arguments, whether you’re right or wrong, whether anything is gained or not. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, who cares if it calls itself a dragon?
But of course, non-recognition of your pretty snowflake labels is also hard for your fragile ideology to handle, so I can understand that you are saddened.
LOL. You are truly uneducated. Thanks for proving this again.
Yeah, we’re TOTES THIRD WAVERS!!
LOL to infinity.
You haven’t studied shit. That’s apparent.
Au contraire. But I don’t need to prove my qualifications to you. You don’t care about them anyway, or would do anything to discredit them when presented, or use them to launch a strawman internet rage campaign if you found out who I am. All you need is to win your internet arguments. It gives you some sort of validation, some sort of comfort. It makes you feel like you are doing something. You are just another third wave branched blogger with no purpose in life.
You’re the one who came here and started whining. You’re the one that can’t tell the difference between radical feminists and third wave neoliberals. Toodles. Now you’re blocked because you really know you have no knowledge of these issues and I’m not interested in hearing more bleating.
And what you call yourself, how you segregate yourselves on belief, means bull. Who cares what you believe? What do you DO? The same thing as everyone else in your wave of feminism. Your stance on sex wars or the position of men is irrelevant when your activism amounts to… this. You really are a foolish pseudointellectual, aren’t you?
What do I do? Let’s see, I’ve worked with women involved in prostitution. I was a research fellow at a major hospital in Vancouver working with local women, mostly aboriginal women who were being prostituted and had drug addictions. That’s just ONE of my jobs. So yeah, I’m now blocking your ass from commenting here and you can take yourself and the stick that’s inserted up your ass with you. Buh bye.
Shouldn’t you be sucking your task-master’s dick or pulling your hair out in frustration over failure to ovulate (like a good little brood mare), instead of trolling the blogs of independent women? Don’t be jealous of HMQ just because you’ve made the choice to throw your freedom away for a man.
Erica’s whining made me think of my mega post on how to spot an MRA. The whining by this dude is EPIC
…and hilarious! And, much more informative than average, I think. I’m so glad to get another glowing report on the progress feminists are making. This is good news.
My name is “Erika”. Not “Erica”.
LOL!!!!! OMG!! You are hilarious…! Is that post supposed to be serious or satire?
I rather suppose you also believe in the Illuminati, Free masons, and the upcoming Martian invasion…!
Look, House Mouse Queen. I don’t dislike you, I really don’t. In fact you can be rather witty when you like.
But come on..! Seriously? You honestly believe this stuff..?
By the way, I do have to admit.., Your mouse is very cute.
Erika is a twanz. Notice the emphasis on GENDER (in all caps), clumsy usage of stereotypical female terms of endearment (dearie, love, etc.), several mentions of “lesbian porn” and last but not least, Erika with a “k” instead of the traditional spelling: Erica. I found it’s YouTube & Google+ account. Let’s just say that it spends an absurd amount of time bashing women and licking men’s asses. Like most trannies, it despises what it will never be. It also claims to be Asian, and yet it seems awfully invested in defending white males.
Thanks Sugar. I had a feeling I was speaking to a man. They can’t hide themselves no matter how hard they try. The violent rhetoric and the entitlement that oozes from them is like a self-perpetuating green slime that gets all over the place. EriKa is now ip banned and will have to cry his mantears somewhere else.