What Do Girl Guides UK, Extreme Porn, and BDSM Have In Common?

In my last post ‘Gender Whisperers’ I talked about transgender ideology permeating organizations, institutions and schools. One such organization, Girl Guides UK, has been infiltrated and, dare I say, infected with the silly notion that humans can change their sex. This unscientific notion has resulted in serious consequences for girls and women and nowhere is this more clear than Girl Guides.

Girl Guides, you would rightly assume, is for girls.

Not any more.

If you are in gender critical and/or radical feminist circles, you’ve probably heard that 2 women volunteers were removed for criticizing GG’s new and ‘inclusive’ transgender policy that allows boys to join and share personal intimate spaces with girls. The Girl Guides also state that they do not have to tell parents whether a biological male will be sharing personal and intimate spaces with their daughters.

Helen Watts was one of the women ‘removed.’

Girl Guides don’t recognize sex as a protected characteristic as they are required by the Equality Act of 2010. On Twitter, Dr Em Pankhurst published the response by the Guides on the ‘removal’ of these volunteers

Dr Em also published GG’s response to concerned parents which shows that GG does not protect by sex and has no intention of doing so.

Girl Guides then released another ‘clarifying’ statement on Twitter regarding the EA:

That makes no sense whatsoever, and many people on Twitter pointed this out.

What’s sinister is finding out who the potential gender whisperers are behind this change in GG.

Dr Em seems to have found one of the men responsible:

John ‘Jane’ Fae Ozimek is a grown man who thinks he’s a woman. He’s been celebrated in UK media and is frequently asked for interviews to teach transgenderism to the public.

John ‘Jane’ Fae Ozimek

John ‘Jane’ Fae Ozimek has some background interests, namely, extreme pornography. Here he is being celebrated by an organization called Backlash that celebrates ‘sexual freedom’ which is a fancy way of saying it tries to legalise extreme pornography like snuff, bestiality, incest, and rape porn.

Here’s a piece written by Jane Fae about how to protect yourself from prosecution if you like watching obscene pornography.

‘Limbering up for a divorce by looking at internet porn sites may provide a degree of self-gratification: but if the end result is going to be a bitter battle over money, maintenance and kids, be very careful.’

Girl Guides were asked whether John ‘Jane Fae’ Ozimek was advising them. They neither confirmed or denied it.

What is apparent to me is that there is a small group of male gender whisperers that have a large financial backing and influence to completely remove women’s and girl’s safety and privacy protections. They are doing this under the guise of ‘transgender equality.’

In fact, Guides admits (see above image) that a transgender lobby group Gendered Intelligence informed them on their new transgender policies. In fact, one of GI’s primary duties is ‘training’ organizations and institutions on transgenderism.

Let’s look at the sexual health booklet put out by GI. Notice that GI was funded by the British National Lottery.

This book shows this image:

This picture clearly outlines that gender is purely psychological and subjective. It’s also attempting to push the false idea that there’s such a thing as a male or female brain. Neuroscientists, in all the years they’ve been looking for brain sex, have not found it.

Then there’s this image, which I took directly from Dr. Em’s Twitter posts.

Dr. Em points out that GI is bordering on truth-telling in the sense that surgeries and hormone blockers are permanent/irreversible changes that don’t function properly and have serious side-effects, including permanent sterilization. For example, research from this summer which looked at the medical records of appx 5,000 men on estrogen showed that males who take estrogen have a high risk of cardiovascular problems. Study is here.

GI also supports rimming (anal licking), anal sex, and BDSM. Just what young girls need to be learning in Guides!

They also admit that males, who they allow in close intimate quarters with young girls, keep their penis.

FairPlay for Women wrote an open letter to Girl Guides that was published in the Sunday Times. Here are some of the women that signed it, explaining why they signed.

Girls don’t need to know how to have anal sex, threesomes and BDSM. They don’t need to share intimate space with biological males who keep their penises when we know that girls are the primary victims of sexual assault and harassment. Girls need safe spaces and their boundaries respected.

It seems to me this is a very concerted effort by a small group of men to completely eliminate all safeguarding of women and girls under the guise of equality. Men are taking feminist principles and perverting them to get their way.

If anyone has any further information about this specific topic, please leave a comment. I’m very interested in who else advised the Guides.

A Little Philosophical Tidbit From Jane Clare Jones

I’m not a philosophy buff but I do know good philosophical arguments when I see them. In this new post by Jane, she lays bare the philosophical motives of transgenderists.

Here is a snippet from ‘Smashing the Binary’:

And this is where it goes completely, utterly off the rails for the woke. Instead of granting reality to both sides of the difference, and working to move our discursive structures away from the way our culture codes those differences, trans ideology has decided to try and abolish the difference itself.  That they can’t grasp the distinction between ‘a difference’ and ‘a binary’ is demonstrated by the fact that they keep referring to the sexual difference between male and female humans – which is a difference in kind between two types of humans – as ‘a binary,’ or even worse, as the ‘gender binary.’ (*Headdesk*). What is so interesting – and distressing – about all of this, is that this act of not grasping that a difference-exists-which-is-not-a-binary, is structured by the basic patriarchal conceit which underpins the whole binary structure in the first place. That is, the inability of the patriarchal subject to relate to anything that differs from itself in without imposing its own projections onto it. As we’re all well aware from our interactions out there, what informs this inability to grant reality to a difference – and to allow that the purportedly ‘inferior’ term of a ‘binary’ might exist as its own difference – is good old fashioned patriarchal narcissism. A way of relating to anything that differs to itself only through an inverting mirror – and that cannot conceive there could be any other way of relating across difference.

For the well-meaning woke, it seems like this is all opaque. Binaries are bad, and so, the thinking goes, to abolish them we need to get rid of the difference that underpins them – a conflation which depends, as so much of the bad-thinking in this debate, on the inability to understand the distinction – and inter-relation – of nature and culture. What can’t be imagined, because the patriarchal structure of hierarchy, othering, and domination has made itself look so. damn. natural., is that there could be differences which were not made into hierarchies. And so, the story goes, if we want men and women to relate equally to each other, the only possible way could be pretending that men, or actually, really, women – are not.

If you would like to read the whole thing, go here.